New Paper in Scientific Data: Modeling Community Standards as Metadata Templates
We’re pleased to highlight the publication of a foundational paper from the CEDAR team in Scientific Data:
“Modeling community standards for metadata as templates makes data FAIR”
by Mark A. Musen, Martin J. O’Connor, Erik Schultes, and colleagues
📄 Read the paper
The Problem: Abstract Guidelines, Inconsistent Metadata
The FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) have become central to modern research data policy—but implementing them at scale remains difficult. Many scientific domains have published metadata reporting guidelines, but these are typically in free-text form, making them difficult to apply in practice or enforce systematically.
The result? Metadata that is often inconsistent, incomplete, or lacking the semantic richness needed to enable true data reuse and discovery.
The Solution: Machine-Actionable Metadata Templates
In this paper, the authors propose a solution: modeling community metadata standards as machine-actionable templates using the CEDAR Workbench. These templates translate the abstract structure and semantics of reporting guidelines into concrete, computable forms that can:
- Enforce field-level validation (e.g., required fields, data types, ontology restrictions)
- Guide users through standards-compliant metadata entry
- Support real-time validation and term selection from community ontologies
- Output structured, linked metadata (in JSON-LD) for downstream reuse
This approach enables template-driven metadata workflows that are intuitive for users but enforce consistency and interoperability across datasets.
Case Studies: From Life Sciences to Community Repositories
The paper showcases how this template-based approach has been adopted in a variety of domains and platforms, including:
- NIH-funded consortia such as HuBMAP and SenNet
- Data repositories like the RADx Data Hub
- Ontology-backed metadata generation for complex experimental workflows
In each case, CEDAR templates were used to encode the structure and constraints of a given community standard, making it possible to author rich, semantically precise metadata directly within existing research platforms or submission systems.
Why It Matters
This work moves FAIR data from theory to practice. By giving communities a way to encode their own metadata standards as reusable templates, the approach enables:
- Scalable metadata harmonization across researchers, institutions, and platforms
- Consistent enforcement of discipline-specific requirements
- Machine-readability by default, not as an afterthought
As the authors argue, structured metadata templates are a cornerstone for achieving truly FAIR data ecosystems.
Learn More
📄 Full article in Scientific Data
For more on how CEDAR enables community-driven metadata tooling, explore our platform overview or reach out to the team.